1. SCENARIO - Private Purchase
This couple had been looking to purchase their own home for years. They had been declined by several banks and other mortgage brokers due to current bankruptcy issues on her end and several judgments that had been filed on his credit bureau. They had a large down payment saved. Both Mr. & Mrs. are self-employed. His business is finally showing lucrative results.
Problem
They both have previous credit issues. Many banks will not lend to someone who has previously suffered a bankruptcy. Additionally you must have been discharged for 1 to 3 years (depending on the lender) and have at least two reestablished trade lines (credit cards, personal loans etc.) for at least one or two years after the discharge.
Solution
We sourced their mortgage to a lender that would lend in the area they wanted to purchase with 35% down payment on the purchase price. She was the principal titleholder while he only went on as guarantor until he was able to clear up the judgements or they disappeared from his credit bureau. This lender required six months of bank statements to verify active business being generated by both parties, his T1 Generals for the last 2 years and her 2011 & 2012 NOA’s (Notice of Assessments that you get from the CRA Canada Revenue Agency after you file your taxes) to verify no taxes were owing to Canada Revenue.
Results
2. SCENARIO - Private Purchase
Combining a first mortgage and a private second mortgage with high rates despite clients having income issues. Mr. & Mrs. had been experiencing income issues and between the two of them they found it hard to show their income. Mr. was having a hard time finding work and was showing little income on his previous years Notice of Assessments. Mrs. had been receiving permanent disability from an insurance payment due to an accident. It was easy to see how they ended up with a second mortgage with rates of 12% and interest only (meaning the payments monthly never go to the principal balance and always go to interest – so in the end you end up owing the same amount that you borrowed) Despite this they had been able to pay their mortgages every month.
Problem
During this time some of their other debts fell behind. Even after Mr. was able to find a permanent job, They inquired to both mortgage lenders and tried to consolidate the two together. Both lenders informed them that they would pay huge penalties for breaking the mortgages.
Solution
We had them go into an open mortgage for 6 months with their first mortgage so that when it came due there would be no penalty to break it. We timed this accordingly so that when their second came due we were able to combine the two mortgages into one complete first.
Results
3. SCENARIO—Purchase With A Co-applicant
4. SCENARIO - Purchase Plus Improvements
5. SCENARIO—Stated Income for Business for Self Individuals that Own Income Properties
Mr. & Mrs. had two rental properties of which one was coming up for renewal. Mrs. is in business for herself showing a gross income of $75K however her line 150 (income earned for the year) was only $17K.
Problem
In today’s mortgage world, lenders are very stringent on business for self clients. Prior to, most individuals were allowed to “state” an amount earned without having to provide financial documents. Today, “stated” income allows us to review the income of the client and to increase the amount they make over and above their line 150 on their tax return. There is a "reasonable" yearly income amount that is deemed appropriate for that line of work or type of business and must be approved by the lender. Clients have to provide their NOA’s (Notice of Assessments) to show no taxes are owing to CRA (some lenders are lenient on this as well). Additionally, if you have an income/rental property, you are only able to finance as high as 80% of the loan to value. This can be tricky. Usually the stumbling block is the Total Debt Servicing Ratio of the client. With smaller income amounts being claimed on line 150, their stated amounts are increased to make the deal work. There is a lot of information collected with these types of applications (rental agreements, etc.)
Solution
We found a lender that would allow us to use a Net Worth Requirement demonstrating ownership of eligible assets and using 12 or 24 months worth of monthly Principal & interest payments, based on a 5-year interest rate and 25 year amortization. The other rental property is considered an eligible asset and in turn we used the equity built up in that home to get this mortgage to work.
Results
The client was able to look at their overall financial picture and make some changes to accommodate what lenders were going to be requiring with her other rental property and additionally how much she claims on her taxes so that her income is more in line with acceptable lending standards.